sid | JACK/DANIEL BABY-A-THON (no infants allowed)

Entry tags:

babyathon,
j/d

JACK/DANIEL BABY-A-THON (no infants allowed)

Brought to you by

sidlj.

It’s time for some commentficcing to offset any post-holiday blues! We'll be running this through Monday, January 19th. There's a supplemental post here for questions and general squeeing.

This is more-or-less how it will work:

You (yes, you, specifically) will write a commentfic or a drabble and post it here as a new comment to the original post. Put a title in the header, if you have one, and maybe a rating or warnings if you think necessary. Crack, porn, romance, sad, silly, dark – however the muse moves you.

THE ONE-AND-ONLY PROMPT: Jack calls Daniel “baby”, or vice-versa. Or both. Because some of us melt and squee and flail when we find that in a fic. And we are not ashamed! We embrace our “baby” kink. We celebrate it.

Let’s wallow, baby!

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only | Expand All

Jack sings.

Let me rephrase that.

Jack tries to sing. He can't but it doesn't stop him. To his credit, he knows he doesn't have the voice for it, so he rarely inflicts his predilection for butchering popular music on the public. But when things are going well, he'll sing in the shower, or along with the radio or just puttering around his place.

How do I know this?

Since we got together, I've been in the somewhat unfortunate position to overhear him. In a way, it's nice since it means I'm so deeply into his life that he doesn't think of me as someone he has to hide his ~~shame~~ secrets from.

On the other hand, it means I have to hear him sing.

No one has ever said being in love was easy.

See, there's another time he likes to sing and I just don't have the heart to try to dissuade him.

He likes to sing to me in bed.

Granted, he usually picks the times when I'm feeling stupid in love and coming down off an orgasmic high to beat all orgasmic highs. Face it, everyone says and does stupid stuff then. 21st century American social mores dictate that there are simply things we don't discuss in polite company and intimate sexual details are high on the list. A long time ago, I figured out it was mainly so no one would be put into the position of confessing to the sappy, syrupy crap said in the afterglow.

Not that I would ever say anything sappy.

Well, not too sappy.

Interestingly enough, "sappy", in the sense of "foolishly sentimental" has been in use since 1670. It came from the Old English word meaning "full of sap" indicating a young tree. What's interesting is that there may have been an intermediate meaning of "wet and sodden", which brings us right back to post-coital couple-bonding.

Well, I thought it was interesting.

But back to Jack.

Last night was one of those nights. As neither of us are exactly teenagers any more, it's gotten easier to hold out, which means, we can each top and bottom in the same night. We just need to have the time. Not to mention the energy (see "teenager, not exactly" comment above). We'd done the 100 yard Jaffa relay to the gate earlier in the day and that was after being on the go for 10 hours. I'm surprised we made it off base. Still, it was, as sex generally is with Jack, phenomenal and, while those details need not be elaborated on here, what happened after needs to be recorded.

We were lying in bed, sheets tangled with our legs, sweat cooling on our skin, exchanging barely there touches and feather light kisses, bodies still humming with sexual release when he started.

I love you baby
and if it's quite all right,
I need you baby
to warm the lonely night.
I love you baby,
trust in me and I'll say,
Oh, pretty baby...

Well, you get the idea. Franki Valli, Jack's not. Still, at the time, I was in that stupid, just fucked state that turns Jack's voice into a combination of Sinatra's, Nat King Cole's and Beverly Sills'. (Yes, I know, they're all dead. I don't have time for libel suits.) Ordinarily, I would have accepted the sentiment and tried to ignore his inability to carry a tune in a bucket. But this was one chorus too far.

I might have gotten a touch angry.

He called me pretty! I couldn't believe it! I came this close to dumping him out of bed. Of all the insulting things he has ever said to me, this takes the cake. Men are not pretty, no matter what the general's secretary, Marge in the mess hall and half the motor pool seem to think. (Which reminds me, note to self: find a way to have a talk with Sergeant Wilson - he's not taking 'oblivious Jackson' for an answer. That's always worked so well in the past, too.)

I AM NOT PRETTY! Jack's going to pay for that one. He spent a good ten minutes trying to apologize, but we ended up falling asleep before he finished. Many wonderful things in the universe are pretty, but I'm not. I probably shouldn't get this worked up over it, but I do have my pride.

Wait.

You thought.

Oh.

Really?

Why would I object to him calling me baby? I may have my pride, and I may have just been fucked stupid, but I'm not crazy.

I'd ask him if he knew "Be My Baby", but I don't want to encourage him.

LOL! This is SO adorable! Poor Jack though, he was just being honest! *nods*

*bows*

Hey, Daniel has to put up with his singing, he shouldn't have to put up with "pretty", too!!!! :-);-) The *nerve* of the man! :-)

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

magnavox-23.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 10:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 10:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

magnavox-23.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 10:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 10:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

magnavox-23.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 10:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 10:36 (UTC) - Expand

Oh, Jack! Crooning to his baby in bed. And Daniel puts up with it. Now that's true love. :-)

Oh won't you be my, be my, be my little baby... hey, are you sure Daniel won't object to being called 'little'? LOL

Depends on how good the sex was. :-);-)

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

sid - 2009-01-11 10:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 10:36 (UTC) - Expand

*snorts*.....However, I soooo wanna hear Jack sing to Daniel in bed!!.....love this.....

Deeds xx

But then Jack would have to kill you.

Or maybe Daniel would. After all, he puts up with it. :-):-)

Hee! Thanks for putting a sappy smile on my face. :)

Sappy Smiles are one of my spec-i-al-i-ties. :-)

Jeeze. I'm showing my age. I remember the Andy Williams version of "You're Just Too Good to be True" better than Frankie Valli's Aieee!
Loved this! :-))

To be honest? I couldn't remember who did it originally, so I googled and snagged the first singer *I* recognized. Given that Daniel's just a few years younger than I am, it seemed the right thing to do. ;-)

Plus, I never cared much for Andy Williams' version.

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

jd-junkie.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 20:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 20:13 (UTC) - Expand

But look! He is so pretty! Silly Daniel. ♥

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 19:51 (UTC) - Expand

*snerk* That tangent is so very Daniel.

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 20:08 (UTC) - Expand

LOL! Good work.

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 20:10 (UTC) - Expand

Awww! Jack singing to Daniel. That's teh hawt!

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 20:12 (UTC) - Expand

I Looooove being in Daniel's brain. "...well I thought it was interesting".. I did too, I did too!
This just rocked!
Love the way you dropped the 4th wall there - just, yay.

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 21:55 (UTC) - Expand

Well, I thought it was interesting.

*giggles madly*

Oh, Daniel. I love you so.

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

tejas.livejournal.com - 2009-01-11 22:56 (UTC) - Expand

that was so sweet and so... sappy. teehee. and also, so very true about how we all get in the afterglow... there's a reason it's called screwing someone's brains out.

i liked this a lot.