JACK/DANIEL BABY-A-THON (no infants allowed)

[sid]

Brought to you by jd_junkie and sidlj.

It’s time for some commentficcing to offset any post-holiday blues! We'll be running this through Monday, January 19th. There's a supplemental post here for questions and general squeeing.

This is more-or-less how it will work:

You (yes, you, specifically) will write a commentfic or a drabble and post it here as a new comment to the original post. Put a title in the header, if you have one, and maybe a rating or warnings if you think necessary. Crack, porn, romance, sad, silly, dark – however the muse moves you.

THE ONE-AND-ONLY PROMPT: Jack calls Daniel “baby”, or vice-versa. Or both. Because some of us melt and squee and flail when we find that in a fic. And we are not ashamed! We embrace our “baby” kink. We celebrate it.

Let’s wallow, baby!

Comments

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

[magnavox-23.livejournal.com]

He gets sex with Jack.

See now you had to go and use logic! ugh! :P

Maybe I shouldn't have had that Queer as Folk marathon today. I've been listening to them all call each other pretty fuckable and what not. :P

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

[tejas.livejournal.com]

But of course. "Pretty" when used as a synonym for "considerable" is perfectly acceptable and doesn't carry any gender specific connotations. "Pretty" when used to denote "pleasing to the eye" is an entirely different story.

(This always happens when I write Daniel. :-)

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

[magnavox-23.livejournal.com]

Or you could just take it to mean both, which is what I was eluding to. :P

Re: Too Good to be True - (J/D, rating: PG for language)

[tejas.livejournal.com]

LOL! Quite true.