'Rebuttal', J/D drabble, rated G
Feb. 16th, 2008 02:40 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If you don't know or care about the scene that was cut from the SGA episode Trio, then you don't need to read this. It was cut, so it ain't canon.
But for me, just knowing that it exists out there in some form calls for:
But for me, just knowing that it exists out there in some form calls for:
REBUTTAL
“So.”
“So.”
“So?”
“Apparently, according to Walter, he heard from Sheppard that McKay told him that Sam was telling people that the two of you have a thing going on. You’re going to retire, yadda yadda yadda.”
“Crap.”
“Yeah.”
“You’re pissed, aren’t you?”
“No. No, no. You know how much I love Sam.”
“Yeah. The problem is that I love her, too, and she knows it.”
“Yeah. She knows it. She just doesn’t get it.”
“Why didn’t she marry Shanahan?”
“We know why.”
“Yeah. Just… why?”
“Because that would make our lives too easy?”
“I wish.” Jack held Daniel more tightly.
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:45 pm (UTC)About 5 paragraphs down.
Although she may have been talking about Hammond. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 04:24 am (UTC)P.S. I tried that justification too but I just couldn't do it to Walter.
I don't doubt that Sam has a thing for Jack, I just don't see Jack returning it. Not the way she wants.
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 04:45 am (UTC)I saw a couple of folks at Mallozzi's blog suggesting Hammond and thought it was a great joke! (But of course George would never hurt Walter that way.)
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:06 pm (UTC)Why *DIDN'T* she marry Pete? I *LIKED* Pete. *sigh*
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 09:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 08:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 09:38 pm (UTC)Boys, boys, boys.... Such
water-coolerwormhole gossips. :)Ain't canon = never happened. Well done, Sid.
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 12:41 am (UTC)Glad my little effort finds favor with you. :-)
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 09:47 pm (UTC)Thank you. This makes me feel better.
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 12:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 16th, 2008 10:51 pm (UTC)Deeds xx
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 02:55 am (UTC)She could have meant Hammond, but I think Walter would take issue. Davis, but she wouldn't be able to stop laughing at the Princess tattoo. Barrett, but he is still alive. Ahh, there are so many men in Washington...
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 03:19 am (UTC)You are so right, though. First of all, the source is RODNEY MCKAY. And we all know how fast he talks. Who knows what he actually said to John (without closed captioning)?
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 04:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 04:19 am (UTC)Thank you.
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 04:46 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 10:10 am (UTC)Boy, I needed that drabble.
And this is so the true scenario. We all know it. Why do the non-believers refuse to see it? I mean, it's canon. We have to see it on screen, though, so that everyone else will be forced to admit it's the truthiness. We deserve a resolution, it's been ten years. We've been screwed around enough.
Sorry. My snark-o-meter is on full tilt this morning. Ignore me. I obviously need to read some hot slash.
*hugs*
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 04:44 pm (UTC);-)
{{hugs}}
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 12:44 pm (UTC)a) Done, over, Sam. Move on.
b) Done, over, Mallozzi. Move on.
c) She should have married Shanahan. Funny, smart, understands the rigors of the job (although I always thought he was an idiot for being all upset that she couldn't share top-secret info with him. Duh!).
d) Your rebuttal makes me fee MUCH better.
e) SO glad they cut that.
f) Done, over, Sam. At this rate, you're going to end up a deluded, crazy stalker-bitch. Kind of like the one over on Carron's site. Heh heh.
*hugs you breathless*
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 17th, 2008 04:46 pm (UTC)*hugs you back while gasping for oxygen*
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 20th, 2008 11:26 pm (UTC)Not that I don't mind people squeeing over their respective OTPs, but the constant hacking away at a character's integrity, and by extension, her fans, makes me grind my teeth.
That little "outtake" (amazing how it only came out later, eh?) - I'm sorry, could we be less vague? If we're dating, just bloody say so; or are we still in Graceland, a fantasy, where nothing, [i]nothing[/i] has been confirmed or agreed, just imagined/perceived? Why does Carter have to make these mentions at all? Does it impact on her command or aide her connections with other female characters?
Sorry, burbling, another reason I fail at engaging (!)
Maybe Mallozzi gets extra points for all the hits on his blog or something...
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 21st, 2008 12:49 am (UTC)I'm sure Mallozzi gets his kicks from stirring things up. *shakes head sadly*
Let's just hope it's the last we ever hear of it. *crosses fingers*
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 21st, 2008 07:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Feb. 22nd, 2008 11:57 pm (UTC)Hm, well, maybe not, the gossip would be brutal.
Let's stick with them cutting that scene all together. Not canon works best for me (and for Sam's dignity)
FF
(no subject)
Date: Feb. 23rd, 2008 12:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Jun. 6th, 2008 09:58 pm (UTC)Sam: i do like boys, i'm DATING a boy!
Keller: Oh em gee, who?
Sam: He goes to another school, you totally wouldn't know him. But he's proof. That i'm totally not a lesbian. Him and the hair. This is Not Lesbian Hair.
that was kind of my take on the outtake.
(no subject)
Date: Jun. 6th, 2008 11:43 pm (UTC)*shakes your hand* Well done.